コンテンツへスキップ | メインメニューへ移動 | 検索に移動
皆様、こんにちは,
New member here, just getting used to the RC4. Really like this software. I’m wondering if the developers have ever considered supporting GPU use instead of just CPU for strategy generation?
Dale
@Roberto, look closer at his myfxbook statements, he has many and most of them is in a loss. Seems He ads and removes funds to make it look good. Just another scumbag scammer probably stole his Cuda cards aswell.
Hi mabi, maybe, but my attention was on the fact that he uses all those gpu core for Deep Learning. I know that SQ doesn’t use DL, but it will be interesting to see results. I’ve read in the roadmap that there is a futuru integration with tensoflor and something similar. Interesting
GPU settings is for the GUI only. SQ do not support GPU for many reason which have been explained before by developer here on the forum due to request from users of GPU implementation ( my self included). I believe the main reason is that GPU like CUDA does not provide any support for on the fly generation of a random number by a thread but mainly that you cant back test a strategy using GPU due to Mark.
こんにちは!
can someone explain what “Accelerate using GPU” actually does? from my testing it doesn’t improve performance. Maybe some particular settings need to be set to use GPU potential?
BTW I’ll actually just add that GPUs should be mining Ethereum, not running Asirkuy. 😀
Just having fun.
Pending live stats….
I try to stick close to what I’ve read from traders who been successful for 20+ years. Is Daniel successful in building systems? It seems he writes articles about what’s not successful (and only data mines them?). Seems like hes still on the journey like many of us.
Yes indeed, but most of the time these are manual traders…. Daniel´s systems are picking up lately it seems, his approach is different, they data-mine on GPUs in the community, hence can test millions of combinations within a few minutes / hours. They explore the whole possible space of combinations by brute forcing it on this network of GPUs. Once a profitable system is found, they right away boot-strap the underlying data for a few million times and the system has to do well on all those data-sets as well, which eliminates mining bias by ~98%. Only then a system is being traded live, so far they have a few hundred fullfilling these and are making money if looking at the MyFxBooks of a few of the users that publish their portfolios (which you can freely compile with different portfolio theory algos).
I am a member too and don´t see it as competition. The tools Asirikuy has to offer add perfectly to SQ. There are MANY things Asirikuy´s tools can do that SQ can´t (GPU usage for PA strategies, neural networks in the Framework and being able to use DLLs and C++ code, community data mining and DMB measurement) and many that SQ has but Asirikuy doesn´t offer. It´s perfect addition so far for me. One thing is clear though: you have to be VERY tech savy (actually could go so far to say you should be a computer-geek) for the Asirikuy tools as many of them are command line based and run in Python, etc. For me that´s no problem, but for some it might, Asirikuy doesn´t offer everything under one graphical interface like SQ does.
can I back test / forward test / perform Monte Carlo analysis on my EAs with one of your software? with my indicators? and maybe using renko bars and other type of bars? in a fast multithreaded multicore 64 bit environment? and even GPU accelerated?
yes… I’m sick of mt4
dave
I investigated it for some time because it would bring quite big speedup, unfortunately GPUs are not made for this kind of computations.
Not everything can be improved using GPUs, GPUs are good for making relatively simple mathematic or matrix operations, but backtesting a strategy is much more complicated and requires features that are very slow in current GPUs.
Sic! And for what did I bought those 2 new GPU on SLI connection ? 🙁
Beside I use I7 3.2ghz , 8gb RAM Kingston HyperX, 500gb HDD and two Nvidia SLI.
And its still a laptop.
I investigated it for some time because it would bring quite big speedup, unfortunately GPUs are not made for this kind of computations.
Not everything can be improved using GPUs, GPUs are good for making relatively simple mathematic or matrix operations, but backtesting a strategy is much more complicated and requires features that are very slow in current GPUs.
マーク
StrategyQuantアーキテクト
Hi, I am new into this but I was wondering if one day it would be possible to use the power of our GPU (graphic card) in order to make calculations. I know there is a language (CUDA from Nvidia) to program a GPU. What do you say about this?
StrategyQuantは、分析および戦略策定用のソフトウェアです。当社はブローカーや投資顧問ではありません。取引の執行、顧客資金の保管、投資助言の提供は一切行っておりません。.
リスク開示:
先物および外国為替取引には多大なリスクが伴い、すべての投資家に適しているわけではありません。投資家は初期投資額のすべて、あるいはそれを超える金額を失う可能性があります。リスク資本とは、経済的安定やライフスタイルを脅かすことなく失うことのできる資金です。取引にはリスク資本のみを使用すべきであり、十分なリスク資本を持つ人のみが取引を検討すべきです。過去の実績は必ずしも将来の結果を示唆するものではありません。.
仮想パフォーマンスに関する開示:
仮想の運用実績には多くの固有の限界があり、その一部は以下の通りです。いかなる口座も、示されたものと同様の利益または損失を出す、あるいは出す可能性が高いという表明は一切なされていません。実際、仮想の運用実績と、特定のトレーディング・プログラムによってその後に達成された実際の運用実績との間には、しばしば著しい乖離が存在します。仮想の運用実績の限界の一つは、一般的に後付けの知恵(結果論)を利用して作成される点にあります。さらに、仮想取引には財務上のリスクが伴わず、いかなる仮想の取引記録も、実際の取引における財務リスクの影響を完全に説明することはできません。例えば、損失に耐える能力や、取引による損失にもかかわらず特定のトレーディング・プログラムを遵守することは、実際の運用実績に悪影響を及ぼす可能性のある重要な要素です。市場全般または特定のトレーディング・プログラムの執行に関連するその他多数の要因についても、仮想の運用実績の作成において完全に考慮することは不可能であり、これらはすべて運用実績に悪影響を及ぼす可能性があります。.
体験談の開示:
www.strategyquant.comに掲載されている体験談は、他の顧客やユーザーの体験を代表するものではなく、将来のパフォーマンスや成功を保証するものではありません。.