SQ Xのアップデート

ここからSQ Xのアップデートやニュースについて話し合うことができます。.

このトピックは「SQ4 Early Preview」から名称変更されました。古い、もはや関連のない投稿は削除され、アーカイブされます。.

ポイントは、古い、関連性のない内容からフォーラムを整理することです。.

Thank Tamas has not been set less secure apps to access.working fine.

トーマスさん、こんにちは,
Thanks for info.

Cheers!

look at the section Testing new indicator in SQ X vs data from MT in the article you mentioned, it is described there step by step.
Basically, you have to use this helper script SqIndicatorValuesExportEA.mq4 in your MetaTrader to compute the indicator data in mT4, then use this file in SQ Indicators tester.

This will show you if the indicator values match between SQ and MT4. If you need more help about this let us know, but it should be quite straightforward.

マークさん、こんにちは,
It works thanks.
One a few more questions:
1) Is it possible to run the Java custom code in debug mode? So that I can see some variables value being executed.
2) If it is possible for debug mode, how about some example of code to print out some variables values (for the purpose of debugging).
2) what is the best version of Java Run-time  for SQX?

ありがとう

I have a proposal, i prefer running the software on linux servers, but i don’t want the GUI, i propose to make a java executable only to start the software without GUI on linux, and be accessible only from chrome by remote, is that possible? Thanks.

or with remote access is available connect from other PC?

if posible, how? SQX run dedicated server and i wand connect with browser, I searched for my IP(server) address and port 8080 (  example: 12.34.56.78:8080)

I feel b122  is slower than b121, i dont have comparison to run benchmark on 121, any people have the same feeling?

yes, i have the same feelings…but sometimes if i close and rerun SQX122 it runs faster…

but its strange, i think its worst than 121

RNG wrote:

I have a proposal, i prefer running the software on linux servers, but i don’t want the GUI, i propose to make a java executable only to start the software without GUI on linux, and be accessible only from chrome by remote, is that possible? Thanks.

ok, this shouldn’t be that difficult. We might be able to add this ioption in B 123

匿名 wrote:

or with remote access is available connect from other PC?
if posible, how? SQX run dedicated server and i wand connect with browser, I searched for my IP(server) address and port 8080 ( example: 12.34.56.78:8080)

yes, it should be possible, but first:

• make sure you have Remote access enabled in SQ – Configuration icon on top right corner. If it is enabled you should be able to open it in browser in your VPS on address: localhost:8080
• If you are using VPS you might also need to enable port 8080 in firewall. Then you should be able to access it from outside using IP address of your VPS

yourrodstaffさんはこう書いた：

I feel b122 is slower than b121, i dont have comparison to run benchmark on 121, any people have the same feeling?

I don’t have this feeling. I test every build before release and B 122 was actually little faster than 121 in my test.

good morning I have the impression(reality) that the 121 in the strategy generation is  more  faster………. the 122 is faster in
mc and optimization and I have to restart often the 122

ありがとう

ジャンフランコ

Please make the integrated benchmark so we can compare 121 and 122.

トーマス

There is a big diffrence in output on 15 min depending what strategy style is used. I get 60000/h having set SQX style and 110000 /h using SQ3 style. Previous versions there was no diffrence only if You were using fuzzy logic which is alittle heavier ofcourse. You might think that more strategies from SQX make it to crosschecks but stats does not show this to be the case and the only crosschecks i am using is higher resolution So something has happend. The diffrence is smaller on H1 .

before i just used some dummy test on algowizard, today I start to edit my  real strategy and found lots of bugs and can not be used, since it can’t save in some conditions, and can lost previous editing and variables, so the all the hard working was gone. this is far from working condition.

mabiは次のように書いています：

There is a big diffrence in output on 15 min depending what strategy style is used.

ok, I’ll check it

yourrodstaffさんはこう書いた：

before i just used some dummy test on algowizard, today I start to edit my real strategy and found lots of bugs and can not be used, since it can’t save in some conditions, and can lost previous editing and variables, so the all the hard working was gone. this is far from working condition.

have you created a bug task for it? we cannot correct it if we don’t know about it.

We fixed many issues in AlgoWizard, it should be working now. I don’t know about any bugs there.

マーク

, I regards to diffrence between SQ3 and SQX styles on 15 min. Today running the same Workflow the diffrence is smaller. Also SQX finds alot more strategies that passes the conditions per hour which means they are discarded earlier using SQ3 style. And normally  depending on what building block is being used i know it can differ aswell so suposedly the diffrence seen had to do with what building blocks SQ was currently working with.

can anyone  explain more on the usage of custom function in algowizard?   the note tell me put the function in the file of   code\customfuctions.mq4,  but when i check the mt4 source code of the strategy there is no line to include this customfuctions.mq4 file, dont know how can my custom function can be used?  please explain it in more detail, thank you.