WFO / WFM bug

2 replies

michael_farrer

Subscriber, bbp_participant, community, customer, sq-ultimate, 9 replies.

Visit profile

7 years ago #116559

Has anyone noticed a bug with WFM and WFO? When highlighting all parameters then applying a % distribution to them all, when you subsequently untick some parameters SQ de recognises the original parameter value for those you have unticked and replaces the value with the lowest or start value in the distribution range. Frustrated I’ve just noticed after running 100s of WFs.

I would not like this issue to be transferred to SQ4.

There is an obvious workaround, but it involves manual intervention which is what we are trying to reduce in SQ4 automated workflows.

d69ec57fe115860286d1da9d7ff8b14d.jpg

a99064daa169c5e218b3083b0506bc97.jpg

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

0

tomas262

Administrator, sq-ultimate, 2 replies.

Visit profile

7 years ago #142353

Hello,

 

the WF parameter bug has been already reported. SQ4 is reworked in that matter so the bug should not appear there.

0

michael_farrer

Subscriber, bbp_participant, community, customer, sq-ultimate, 9 replies.

Visit profile

7 years ago #142375

Ok great, thanks for letting me know.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

0

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)