Reply

Version 142: massive performance issues

3 replies

obertopps

Customer, bbp_participant, community, sq-ultimate, 49 replies.

Visit profile

3 months ago #289832

Hello,

after upgrading from 141 to 142 (complete reinstall in empty new directory) I experience massive performance issues while generating strategies (builder) – no matter if genetic or not.

The time per created strategy increased by factor 10-15. With the older verions of SQ 141 building a strategy with my specfic settings took about 10-20 ms, now it´s about 180-280ms (inacceptable).

I think the program doesn´t use all cores anymore (32 in my case), as the system is very silent (no cooling activity, which was different in the past too). I didn´t change the hw config or anything else.

I run three parallel clones of 142 in parallel on this system.

Could you please check, what could be the problem?

Thanks, Sven

 

Kind regards, Sven
{pipsquirrel}

"You say: 'money doesn't make me happy' - so hand it over to me!" 🙂

0

tomas262

Administrator, sq-ultimate, 2 replies.

Visit profile

3 months ago #289854

This is strange. Having such a huge performance drop needs to be checked. Can you share the project workflow or the builder configuration used so I can make a speed comparison test?

0

obertopps

Customer, bbp_participant, community, sq-ultimate, 49 replies.

Visit profile

3 months ago #289898

Hi Thomas,

I don´t hav a specific project workflow (all manual, as I never had enough time to automate it :-)), but attached, you can find my current builder config.

BTW: it didn´t change from version to the other.

KR

Sven

Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.

Kind regards, Sven
{pipsquirrel}

"You say: 'money doesn't make me happy' - so hand it over to me!" 🙂

1

obertopps

Customer, bbp_participant, community, sq-ultimate, 49 replies.

Visit profile

1 week ago #291179

Any news here? The performance issues are still in place!

Kind regards, Sven
{pipsquirrel}

"You say: 'money doesn't make me happy' - so hand it over to me!" 🙂

0

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)