Darwinex Data

I made such a test. I downloaded darwinex from 3 different sources at the same time and uploaded it to SQX for analysis. and from the result, do I understand correctly that directly downloaded darwinex data is of the worst quality because it has the largest number of gaps? and why is that?

data collected from: Directly SQX darwinex, Directly darwinex FTP server and Tick data suite darwinex data.

P.S. I also prepared Dukascopy data for comparison.

add MT5 Data

Hi,
I will check with our dev team what could be causing this and let you know

Apologize for the delay. It seems the historical data is modified (back-filled) by Darwinex / Dukascopy often. What we will need to do is update our CDN data regularly to take these modifications into account

when will you start updating your data regularly?

Hello,

we are implementing changes now about this. It will take some time though. I will keep updating this thread when changes are made

Hi Tomas,

Can you please confirm if this issue has been resolved and if the Darwinex data downloaded through SQX is being updated permanently?

Thank you and best regards.

Hi, I see the problem persists.
Although StrategyQuant says the data is downloaded in UTC, when you look at it, you see a one-hour difference between the Dukascopy and Darwinex data.
This means that when you clone the time zone, even though StrategyQuant is EST+7, when you check the cloned data from Dukascopy and Darwinex, there is still a one-hour difference.

This UTC data issue only affects forex, oil, and gas.
Indices and gold are displayed correctly.