Darwinex Data

I made such a test. I downloaded darwinex from 3 different sources at the same time and uploaded it to SQX for analysis. and from the result, do I understand correctly that directly downloaded darwinex data is of the worst quality because it has the largest number of gaps? and why is that?

data collected from: Directly SQX darwinex, Directly darwinex FTP server and Tick data suite darwinex data.

P.S. I also prepared Dukascopy data for comparison.

add MT5 Data

Hi,
I will check with our dev team what could be causing this and let you know

Apologize for the delay. It seems the historical data is modified (back-filled) by Darwinex / Dukascopy often. What we will need to do is update our CDN data regularly to take these modifications into account

when will you start updating your data regularly?

Hello,

we are implementing changes now about this. It will take some time though. I will keep updating this thread when changes are made