Not logged in
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • #240863| Reply
    Participant
    3 Posts

    Hello,
    can anyone write me please a performance PC in a standardized test (SQX Main menu / Settings -top right / benchmark)?
    Especially for a single-processor workstation. Best for Xeon E5-26xx series (CPU, version CPU or GHz, RAM,DDR3 or DDR4, number of strategies).

    Thanks

    #240936 Reply
    Participant
    3 Posts

    The price of 2x Xeon X5650 is very interesting. If you have someone, please write about the performance in SQX.

    Thanks

    #240938 Reply
    Customer
    467 Posts

    Looking at budget Single Xeons or older dual systems like X5650 I would instead go for a Threadripper with higher GHZ. The 1950X is cheap now and outperforms any older models of XEONs when making strategies in SQX. I find it is easy to compare performance in SQx between CPu’s. Just multiply total core count with Ghz and you have it.

    #240947 Reply
    Customer
    144 Posts

    2x XEON E5-2680 – 80000 strs in benchmark

    :) [b]You want to be a profitable algotrader? Sharing of final strategies with real traders just started. Fill in this FORM[/b]

    #240952 Reply
    Customer
    467 Posts

    Dual Systems with more then 64 Threads are splitted in groups by Windows and SQx can only use one Group. So 2 SQX has to be used to utilize both CPU,s or You have to disable Hyper threading. So i run 2 test in my dual system

    1x XEON E5-2673 V4 – 82000 strs in Benchmark

    1x XEON E5-2673 V4 -77000 strs in Benchmark

    1x XEON E5-2698 V4- 73000  ”

    1xXEON E5-2698 V4- 66000 ”

     

    Notice that one CPU always performs better then the other in dual socket systems.

    #240955 Reply
    Participant
    3 Posts

    mabi, hankeys:

    thank you for the information.

    #241039 Reply
    Customer
    467 Posts

    Threadripper 2950x – 84000

    #241109 Reply
    Customer
    467 Posts

    Threadripper 2950x – 84000

    Threadripper “gaming Mode”    – 93000   ( simultaneous multi threading turned of gives higher usage and output on all processes as WF, Montercarlo and Generation)

    #241155 Reply
    Customer
    10 Posts

    Benchmark

     

    Threadripper 1950x

    64gb @ 3200mhz

     

     

     

    #241261 Reply
    Customer
    491 Posts

    Benchmarking is vanity; the actual production number is sanity.

    Just saying…no competition; not suggesting I’m better…

     

     

    Vanity

    #241273 Reply
    Customer
    144 Posts

    these numbers will tell us nothing, we dont know what are you generating…this is not comparable if everyone is not using the same settings

    also benchmark from SQX could get results from 60-80 k, so it could differ, because its running only for few seconds

    for this purposes we run the same project for 1 hour in one of the cooperation groups and get these results

    this is comparable

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.

    :) [b]You want to be a profitable algotrader? Sharing of final strategies with real traders just started. Fill in this FORM[/b]

    #241299 Reply
    Customer
    491 Posts

    these numbers will tell us nothing, we dont know what are you generating…this is not comparable if everyone is not using the same settings also benchmark from SQX could get results from 60-80 k, so it could differ, because its running only for few seconds for this purposes we run the same project for 1 hour in one of the cooperation groups and get these results this is comparable

     

    Understood.

     

    it was more tongue in cheek to honest.

     

    I do not know the limits of SQX because I haven’t used it for very long.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Reply To: Performance Xeon workstation and SQX

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Your information: