Přejít k obsahu | Přejít k hlavnímu menu | Přejít k vyhledávání

tick data Vs M1 data WFM M1

3 replies

4 years ago #242471

I did a little test with tick date and M1 date
WFM M1 with tick source
wfm M1 with source M1
I found a processing time difference about 1 to 20
in favor of M1 source I finish the test with tick and then we will see the difference of the results the scan is on the 2 tests equals M1
Thank you
Gianfranco

4 years ago #242497

I did the same thing on my machine and get exactly opposite results, TICK data is faster than M1 data??? Which is not logical….See attachment.

Has anybody seen something similar?

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

This is a false statement.

4 years ago #242510

Guys be careful, sometimes this new SQX made a trick, idk why even if you select “Tick real spread” it still in the previous mode “1 minute” in my configuration.
To prevent this every time that i retest with higher precision i stare at the log and watch the quantity of memory loaded to understand if it really retest with better precision or not.

4 years ago #242513

I instead look at how long it takes sqx to retest with the 2 different ways…. in general the longer it takes and the more the scan is precise…… In theory… you often sqx with data does something strange…

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

Risk Disclosure:
Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure:
Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. no representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure:
Testimonials appearing on www.strategyquant.com may not be representative of the experience of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.