Reply

SQX feature for snowrolling / adding to winning positions.

10 replies

kasinath

Subscriber, bbp_participant, customer, community, sq-ultimate, 112 replies.

Visit profile

3 years ago #260540

I have seen some success with the turtles-style pyramiding for trending markets, and I’d like to explore ways to do this in SQX.

IE: Once price breaks out of a range, buy and add to the position as it trends in the favourable direction, with tighter stop losses, up to a certain multiple of the original lot size.

I see there is an option in SQX for max lot size at any given time, which can give you some kind of pyramiding when you enable multiple orders. This seems like a workaround, not an elegant solution.

Are there any plans to add configurable pyramiding positioning?

Thanks as always for the great work.

0

kasinath

Subscriber, bbp_participant, customer, community, sq-ultimate, 112 replies.

Visit profile

3 years ago #260541

For anyone interested, here’s some reading on the topic:

https://sites.google.com/site/prof7bit/snowball

0

Andrew Wolney

Customer, bbp_participant, community, 3 replies.

Visit profile

3 years ago #260542

I’m curious about this as well

0

clonex / Ivan Hudec

Customer, bbp_participant, community, sq-ultimate, contributor, author, editor, 271 replies.

Visit profile

3 years ago #260635

You could do this via strategy template.

0

kasinath

Subscriber, bbp_participant, customer, community, sq-ultimate, 112 replies.

Visit profile

3 years ago #260654

I did not know this.

Will investigate further, thanks!

0

gin

Subscriber, bbp_participant, 88 replies.

Visit profile

3 years ago #260692

so no adding new position with locked trailing profits from running trade?

 

0

Richard Brennan

Customer, bbp_participant, community, 25 replies.

Visit profile

3 years ago #260701

Hi K

I did a fair bit of work on the Snowball on FF    but ultimately agreed with PipMeUp and concluded that the concentration of trades during trending environments was less efficient than a single trade at the outcome of a trend.

Rich B

0

kasinath

Subscriber, bbp_participant, customer, community, sq-ultimate, 112 replies.

Visit profile

3 years ago #260702

Not surprised you had dabbled in this 🙂

Great read. Thanks for sharing.

I wonder if, with the right strategy and the right settings, we could achieve  trade pyramiding strategy that works.

I’ll mess around with it in the coming weeks and report back.

0

Richard Brennan

Customer, bbp_participant, community, 25 replies.

Visit profile

3 years ago #260704

Cheers K

But if you read between the lines, that is what we are doing with diversification. We take a diversified approach to addressing a multiplicity of different possible trend trajectories…..and not investing all our effort in a pyramiding approach along the same trend trajectory.

Definitely have a mess around with it. It is a beauty to see in action on a long smooth trend….but it has a kick in the guts when addressing less well behaved trends.

Snowball Anti-Martingale

 

Rich B

0

kasinath

Subscriber, bbp_participant, customer, community, sq-ultimate, 112 replies.

Visit profile

3 years ago #260705

So true .. so true..

Thanks for that reminder actually. Better to ‘scale up’ using different trajectories.

Will keep that in mind as I play around with it. It should be worthwhile still, if only for the learning experience.

Thanks!

 

0

gin

Subscriber, bbp_participant, 88 replies.

Visit profile

3 years ago #261353

add to a trend on pull back

 

0

Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)