I use the CAlgo platform for trading (https://www.spotware.com/products/client-side-applications/calgo) as I’m a C# Developer and find it easy to code. I’ve been experimenting converting the StrategyQuant pseudocode to CAlgo, which seems fairly straightforward. However, I’m seeing massive differences when backtesting strategies I’ve generated in StrategyQuant in CAlgo.
I was wondering if anyone else has experience using these two applications? or any ideas why the results seem to differ so much?
I’m using historical data from HistData (http://www.histdata.com) to generate my strategies in StrategyQuant, and CAlgo provides it’s own backtesting data.
I converted a SQ3 strategy (quite a simple one really) to cAlgo, and I too see major differences when backtesting in cAlgo. As yet I don’t have an explanation for the differences. The lack of visual backtesting in cAlgo makes detective work more difficult.
I’m sort of concerned actually that the cAlgo backtesting engine is flawed in some way, since the strategies backtest as expected in MetaTrader 4….
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.