Is it possible that setting different multiple range of ATR in Sq3.8?

We don’t know how long to wait for the SQ4’s release.

 

I want to set different multiple of ATR for SL and PT. It’s very urgent.

 

Is it possible that we could get a fixed update before Sq4ï¼Å¸ I fear that SQ4’s development would spend a long time.

I can’t see another SQ3 release coming out before SQ4, even though I suspect SQ4 is at least another 6 months months away from being usable… but worth asking.

You can optimize ready strategy via optimizer or edit it. But native generating new strategies in SQ3 with different SLPT is not possible

I would like to see SQ3 fix the issue of using ATR for SL and TP, and allowing the selection of Limit Risk to Reward ratio to work correctly.

 

It should randomly pick the ATR period (e.g ATR(50) ), and apply the period 50 to both SL AND TP.  Then the multiplier for the SL and TP should be calculated to give the correct risk to reward ratio.

 

At the moment, SQ does not do this and it picks two random periods and so the risk to reward setting is ignored.  It’s another serious SQ3 shortcoming I pointed out months and months ago…maybe even years ago now!

Thanks for your feedback. I will check with Mark for possible fix in the current version

Thanks,tomas262.

And optimization can only improve ONE strategy once. I want to make batch generating. It is more worth to do that.

fixed Sl Tp based on ATR will make difference for sq3 . I stoped using it because of that ,

as when i make a strategy i put r:r 1:3 or 1:2 

then i ll have smth foolish like : 

tp 3(Atr of 14)

SL 1 ( Atr of 200)

that doesnt make any sense as it should be 

tp 3x atr(14)

Sl  1 x atr(14) 

That makes a true Risk reward .

 

Before i quit on sq3 i used no sl or to because of that and i use exit by indicator but the lag of indicators made the strategies dangerous ,

It would be great tomas to fix that issue and it doesnt take long to do such small bug fix .

Thank you

fixed Sl Tp based on ATR will make difference for sq3 . I stoped using it because of that ,

as when i make a strategy i put r:r 1:3 or 1:2 

then i ll have smth foolish like : 

tp 3(Atr of 14)

SL 1 ( Atr of 200)

that doesnt make any sense as it should be 

tp 3x atr(14)

Sl  1 x atr(14) 

That makes a true Risk reward .

 

Before i quit on sq3 i used no sl or to because of that and i use exit by indicator but the lag of indicators made the strategies dangerous ,

It would be great tomas to fix that issue and it doesnt take long to do such small bug fix .

Thank you

 

I suggest every indicators in building blocks, their parameters  can inherit the global setting, and also have their own  range or fixed value, and their own setting is prior.