Not logged in

Forums

Viewing 7 posts - 16 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • #134773 |
    Customer
    309 Posts

    Hi Clonex,

    something happened, or its just maintarence? Harmony trade is off.

    Thanks.
    Patrik

    No everything is ok. Mfxbook has problem to connect to the mt4 server. It should be fixed soon.

    Odoslané z SM-G900F pomocou Tapatalku

    #134784
    Customer
    309 Posts
    #134785
    Customer
    934 Posts

     

    Hi clonex,

     

    Thanks for taking the time to put the link back.

     

    2% gain in 5 months, I’m guessing this is not what the SQ backtests and results were looking like?  Any thoughts on the poor performance?

     

    Regards,

     

    Mike

    #134787
    Customer
    435 Posts

    Hi clonex,

     

    Thanks for taking the time to put the link back.

     

    2% gain in 5 months, I’m guessing this is not what the SQ backtests and results were looking like?  Any thoughts on the poor performance?

     

    Regards,

     

    Mike

     

    Yes he said he had to kick out half of the strategies, so its probably still in development and it should be developed forever…

    #134788
    Customer
    309 Posts

    Hi,

     

    5 months +2% is ok. YtY  performance was around 40%. Second half of 2015  was difficult. Look at the benchmarks. And real trades are/were( in Swissquote and Pepperstone) almost 95% same like in SQ simulation 😉 ( except one another broker). This is most important for me. If reality goes like simulation, Im ok. I compare this very very very detailed . Because only (in my mind)  THE ONLY PROOF that my approach (and SQ 3.8) is ok  … is this. (same trades in simulation and real trading)

     

    Best,

     

    Clonex

    #134794
    Customer
    435 Posts

    solved. thanks

    #134815
    Customer
    614 Posts

    Hi,

     

    5 months +2% is ok. YtY  performance was around 40%. Second half of 2015  was difficult. Look at the benchmarks. And real trades are/were( in Swissquote and Pepperstone) almost 95% same like in SQ simulation 😉 ( except one another broker). This is most important for me. If reality goes like simulation, Im ok. I compare this very very very detailed . Because only (in my mind)  THE ONLY PROOF that my approach (and SQ 3.8) is ok  … is this. (same trades in simulation and real trading)

     

    Best,

     

    Clonex

     

    Can fully confirm that I am really happy with SQ in that relation as well, 95%+ of the live trades done with the exported Metatrader EAs are exactly the same in SQ when afterwards backtested in SQ within the same time-range and data of the broker you used for live trading.

     

    That´s one really important point that MANY other platforms don´t deliver – e.g. the strategies you backtest there do just barely match the live trading. So thumbs up for SQ in that relation.

Viewing 7 posts - 16 through 22 (of 22 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.