I am currently practicing my robustness tests, and I came across an interesting situation. During the backtests over different timeframes, if you come across a strategy that blows the back test out of the water (ie – moderate on M30 – 32% win rate/8.5 Return/DD; same strategy over H1 backtest – higher win rate/much higher Return/DD), do you restart a whole robustness test on that strategy? Or, do you just go about robustness tests and disregard?
I have seen this only a couple of times, but I can see one getting caught chasing down strategy after strategy that just “pops” up during testing.
Just curious; would love to hear your insights!
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.