Přejít k obsahu | Přejít k hlavnímu menu | Přejít k vyhledávání

Finding Good Strategies DURING Robustness Tests

1 replies

6 years ago #232502

Hello,

I am currently practicing my robustness tests, and I came across an interesting situation. During the backtests over different timeframes, if you come across a strategy that blows the back test out of the water (ie – moderate on M30 – 32% win rate/8.5 Return/DD; same strategy over H1 backtest – higher win rate/much higher Return/DD), do you restart a whole robustness test on that strategy? Or, do you just go about robustness tests and disregard?

I have seen this only a couple of times, but I can see one getting caught chasing down strategy after strategy that just “pops” up during testing.

Just curious; would love to hear your insights!

6 years ago #232509

Read the E-book and follow the recommended workflow. The ones thats passes you then put live on incubation and when they have a long period of good performance you have a good one that you can add to a portfolio and increase size as per your available capital.

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)

Risk Disclosure:
Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure:
Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. no representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure:
Testimonials appearing on www.strategyquant.com may not be representative of the experience of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.