The Profit Factor factor
Before SQ I was aiming to build EAs with a high profit factor, but since using SQ I can see the value of the Return/Drawdown ration as an indicator of a good EA. I have noticed that there are a lot of strategies found that have a reasonable R/DD but not a great PF. I used to think that it wasn’t really worth running an EA with a PF <2, but that seems hard to achieve using strategies I’ve been testing with SQ.
What impact does PF have in a strategy when we find a high R/DD strategy that is robust? Should we still be aiming for high PF?
each formula that transforms strategy results to some score number has its flaws.
I personally consider Return/Drawdown when checking the strategies, and then scores like Annual Percentage Return or R-Expectancy.
I look also at Profit Factor,but not as the deciding score.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)