SQ X updates
955 replies
Mark Fric
8 years ago #114916
Here’s where we can discuss SQ X updates nad news.
This topic was renamed from SQ4 Early preview. The old, no longer relevant posts are or will be deleted and archived.
The point is in clearing up our forum from old, non-relevant stuff.
Mark
StrategyQuant architect
Mark Fric
4 years ago #247472
we updated installer in version 123, so that could also be why it works now.
We also made it so that when you install new version to an existing SQ folder it will recognize it and does not overwrite u/user folder, keeping all your data, configs and strategies intact.
Mark
StrategyQuant architect
hankeys
4 years ago #247476
nice one…
You want to be a profitable algotrader? We started using StrateQuant software in early 2014. For now we have a very big knowhow for building EAs for every possible types of markets. We share this knowhow, apps, tools and also all final strategies with real traders. If you want to join us, fill in the FORM.
tnickel
4 years ago #247480
hankeys
4 years ago #247554
when a portfolio master will be added to SQX, are there any plans?
You want to be a profitable algotrader? We started using StrateQuant software in early 2014. For now we have a very big knowhow for building EAs for every possible types of markets. We share this knowhow, apps, tools and also all final strategies with real traders. If you want to join us, fill in the FORM.
Tanaroj Rangsicharoenlerd
4 years ago #247585
sqx has bug?
why i backtest use same data from mt4 and sqx
resault not same or nearly?
please guide me
tomas262
4 years ago #247587
sqx has bug? why i backtest use same data from mt4 and sqx resault not same or nearly? please guide me
Tanaroj, this topic does not serve the purpose of reporting such things as backtest differences. You can send me the strategy to [email protected] and I can help you find reasons why the backtest does not match
Mark Fric
4 years ago #247595
Taranaj – this is most probably a problem of different data or setings. Backtest in SQ should match MT4.
There is a description about reliable backtesting in our documentation: https://strategyquant.com/doc-category/reliable-backtesting/
hankeys – no, we don’t have plan for that for the near future. There are many things that could be added to SQ that have higher priority. But we are going to add some new features into build 125, maybe (just maybe) we’ll be able to add also Portfolio master.
Mark
StrategyQuant architect
yourrodstaff
4 years ago #247705
It seems like with the B124 I can hardly get strategy builder output if I check the crosscheck monte carlo ,
without MC on I can get reasonable output rate say 30s to mins per strategy , with MC on it will take 7hrs to 2day.
i believe it is not the case at least before B122,
so far I can’t tell it is due to my configuration or it is due to the updates, anyone else experiencing the same problem?
hankeys
4 years ago #247707
no…in B124 was added 2 things to MC tests
– backtest precision
– setting if you want to run MC test on IS only or on full sample
so maybe its about your setting, i dont experience any problems
You want to be a profitable algotrader? We started using StrateQuant software in early 2014. For now we have a very big knowhow for building EAs for every possible types of markets. We share this knowhow, apps, tools and also all final strategies with real traders. If you want to join us, fill in the FORM.
kainc301
4 years ago #248300
Hey Mark,
From my observations, it seems as if we’re very close to a fully stable build of SQX with the last round of impeding bugs to be addressed in the next build 125.
Build 124 has been pretty stable for me so far. That being said, is the focus for future builds after 125 going to still be bug fixes? Or will there be more of a shift towards implementing new features?
I see you’re adding more portfolio capabilities in 125 (which is amazing and much appreciated). With the amount of “significant” bugs decreasing, Do you feel like SQX is ready to shift more towards more significant features yet or do you feel like there is still much work to be done of higher priority before getting there? Curious as to your thoughts on the next phase for SQX and if you think we are approaching it or if it still seems far away.
Mark Fric
4 years ago #248301
we added some new bugger features already in Build 123/4. YOu are right that the number of bugs is lower, our goal is to fix all the reported bugs, but none of them are blocking, so we have time also for new features.
The goal for B 125 is to fix as many reported bugs as possible, and again add some new major features – we will add possibility to import custom data (indicators) like it was in SQ3, and computation of all metrics also for every OOS part separately if you use multiple OOS.
Mark
StrategyQuant architect
ytu
4 years ago #248320
Hi all, I need help for a guide on how to use SQX to create EA for a BINARY OPTIONS TRADING.
Is it possible? If it is how?
Note: the broker is able to accept order for binary trading
OrderSend(Symbol(), OP_BUY, Lots, Bid, 3, 0, 0, “BO exp:X”)
where:
OP_BUY is the parameter for purchasing a Call Option and OP_SELL is the parameter for purchasing a Put Option.
Lots is a variable of type “double” equal to the size of the trade. For example Lots=100 would open a trade with 100 USD.
“BO exp:X” – replace “X” with the desired expiry expressed in seconds. Please note that the expiry should be one of the available: 60, 120, 300, 600, 900, 1800, 3600, 14400 or 86400 seconds.
Thx
kainc301
4 years ago #248325
Hi all, I need help for a guide on how to use SQX to create EA for a BINARY OPTIONS TRADING. Is it possible? If it is how? Note: the broker is able to accept order for binary trading OrderSend(Symbol(), OP_BUY, Lots, Bid, 3, 0, 0, “BO exp:X”) where: OP_BUY is the parameter for purchasing a Call Option and OP_SELL is the parameter for purchasing a Put Option. Lots is a variable of type “double” equal to the size of the trade. For example Lots=100 would open a trade with 100 USD. “BO exp:X” – replace “X” with the desired expiry expressed in seconds. Please note that the expiry should be one of the available: 60, 120, 300, 600, 900, 1800, 3600, 14400 or 86400 seconds. Thx
Currently, the only way to achieve this is to set the max duration a trade can be open for x bars and use x in order to determine time. I submitted a request to add the option to specify a time interval as this will be needed for non time based bars and it was moved to the backend. So no idea when it will be added but specifying specific duration was moved to the backlog of tasks to complete. Currently it is in SQ programming https://sq.projectpanel.com/tasks/sqp_0004
kainc301
4 years ago #248327
ytu
4 years ago #248328
Currently, the only way to achieve this is to set the max duration a trade can be open for x bars and use x in order to determine time. I submitted a request to add the option to specify a time interval as this will be needed for non time based bars and it was moved to the backend. So no idea when it will be added but specifying
specific duration was moved to the backlog of tasks to complete. Currently it is in SQ programming https://sq.projectpanel.com/tasks/sqp_0004
Thanks for info above. Really appreciate it.
Can you send me an example of SQX file to let me start with some hands-on (this is my best Christmas present this year 🙂
Also, does anyone knows a list of Binary Options brokers accepting orders via MT4 EA?
Thx.